Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find a LawyerMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • COVID 19 Updates
    • Covid 19Covid 19 Updates
      • Client Resources
        • Client Interaction Considerations
        • Client Identification and Verification
        • Testamentary Documents
      • Practice Interruptions
      • COVID-19 Response FAQs
      • COVID-19 HR Related FAQs
      • Health and Wellness
        • Wellness Together Canada
      • Technology Webinars
        • Working Remotely Resources
      • Business and Economic Support
  • About Us
    • About LSS VideoAbout Us
      Play video Our independence from the government is primary to our mission; it is important to the administration of justice and is fundamental to maintaining a free and democratic society that respects the Rule of Law. That is, the legal profession is uniquely positioned in society to provide a check and balance on government power by ensuring citizens who are in conflict with the government have access to impartial legal representation and ensuring accountability in all areas of society.
      • Mission, Vision, Values and Direction
      • Executive
      • Benchers
        • 2018 Bencher Election
      • Convocation
      • 2021 Committees and Task Forces
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Contact Us
  • News
      • slider_1Latest News
      • Joint Announcement by the Court Services Branch of the Ministry of Justice and the Saskatchewan Legal Aid Commission
      • Call for Submissions for Walter Owen Book Prize
      • Notice of Hearing
      • Podcasts
      • Legal Sourcery
      • Annual Reports
      • Benchers’ Digest
      • Re:Source Mail
      • Video
      • Case Mail
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services
        • Saskatchewan Legal Coaching and Unbundled Services Pilot Project
      • Equity
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
        • National Trusted Intermediaries and Legal Information Network
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules and Amendments
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Admissions and Education Proceedings
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding a Lawyer
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Designated Holidays
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students
        • National Mobility Transfers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Lost Will Listings
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Locum Registry
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
  • Shop
Search

Load More

Generic filters
Law Society of Saskatchewan Case Law Estate Litigation Update: Thorne v Thorne, 2020 SKQB 341 (CanLII)

Estate Litigation Update: Thorne v Thorne, 2020 SKQB 341 (CanLII)

February 22, 2021

By James Steele, Robertson Stromberg LLP

A recent case of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen Bench offers the following lesson: the Court’s power to “fix” clerical mistakes in Wills, may not necessarily be ordered if there are deeper concerns about the testator’s actual testamentary intentions.

Section 37 of The Wills Act, 1996,  SS 1996, c W-14.1, allows the court to “cure” Wills which have certain flaws in them. Such flaws may include the wrong number of witnesses, or some other formality which is missing.

The provision is set out below:

37    The court may, notwithstanding that a document or writing was not executed in compliance with all the formal requirements imposed by this Act, order that the document or writing be fully effective as though it had been properly executed as the will of the deceased or as the revocation, alteration or revival of the will of the deceased or of the testamentary intentions embodied in that other document, where a court, on application is satisfied that the document or writing embodies:

(a) the testamentary intentions of a deceased; or

(b)  the intention of a deceased to revoke, alter or revive a will of the deceased or the testamentary intentions of the deceased embodied in a document other than a will.

[Emphasis added]

In Thorne, Keili Thorne had applied for a declaration, under s. 37 of The Wills Act, 1996,  SS 1996, c W-14.1, that a document signed by Richard  Thorne (in early October 2014) was fully effective as though it had been properly executed as the will of Mr. Thorne.

The will had been signed in front of two witnesses, but only one of those witnesses signed the document to indicate that he witnessed Mr. Thorne’s signature. Ordinarily, this application would be a simple matter, and the Court would most likely have cured the Will under s. 37.

However, this particular application was opposed by Lia Tanit Thorne and Brendan Johnston Thorne. Tanit and Brendan argued that the Will had suspicious circumstances regarding Mr. Thorne’s testamentary capacity at the time that he signed the document.

The Court’s decision:

The Court acknowledged that the document looked and read like a will. However, the Court held that s. 37 also requires the court to be satisfied that the document actually sets out the testator’s final testamentary disposition.

The Court recognized that Tanit and Brendan had raised a number of concerns about the testator’s behavior in 2014:

  1. Prior to signing the document, Mr. Thorne had intended to benefit all three of his children equally. The document he eventually signed did not do that;
  2. There was evidence (including evidence of people other than the parties) of Mr. Thorne’s positive ongoing relationship with Brendan;
  3. Gwenda (testator’s sister) recounted estate planning discussions with Mr. Thorne in which he planned an equal distribution of his estate among his three children.
  4. There was evidence suggesting that, around the time that he signed the document, Mr. Thorne faced challenges as to his mental acuity. In his November 14, 2014 email to Gwenda he wrote:

I’m beginning to think we never finished the POA. What we did when she was here was I made her co-administrator of my Honduran Corp. which owns all my assets here. She has the power to sell if she wants. She also has a bunch of signed cheques so she can access the money in my accounts.

But then again I’m not sure. I may have signed some stuff. Sheeeshhh..

  1. There was no evidence before the court (other than the document itself) as to Mr. Thorne’s testamentary capacity or intentions at the time that he signed the document;
  2. There was no evidence before the court as to the circumstances surrounding the preparation and signing of the document. The court does not know who prepared it, or on whose instructions.

The applicant provided rebuttal evidence, as to show that Mr. Thorne did manifest an intent to make the applicant his sole beneficiary. However, the Court felt faced with a conflict on the evidence as to just what Mr. Thorne truly intended. The Court felt that it was premature for the Court to make a binding determination on the basis of the affidavit evidence before it:

[19]       There remains, though, the evidence supporting the opposite conclusion. The respondents have provided good reasons for doubting that Mr. Thorne had testamentary capacity when he signed the document. In particular I note his long-term plan to benefit all three of his children, the unexplained circumstances surrounding the preparation and signing of the document, and Mr. Thorne’s own expressed uncertainty as to what he had signed.

[20]            Possibly it is simply a matter that Mr. Thorne had had enough of the respondents and had decided to leave everything to the applicant. There are, however, too many outstanding questions surrounding Mr. Thorne’s signing of the document for me to be satisfied with respect to s. 37(a). That is, while I recognize the possibility that Mr. Thorne had testamentary capacity, so that the document embodies his testamentary intentions, I am not satisfied that it is the case. The question cannot be determined only on the evidence that is before me. [emphasis added]

Therefore, the Court ordered a trial of the issue of whether the document is Mr. Thorne’s will. The applicant, as proponent of the will, would bear the onus of proving the will. The Court awarded the costs of both parties, for this application, out of the Estate.

Lesson:

S. 37 is a useful tool to help ensure that a document which embodied the testamentary intention of a deceased, will not fail simply due to an oversight of some formality (i.e. not enough witnesses, etc.)

However, Thorne reminds us that the s. 37 power is not a rubber stamp, if there are underlying concerns with the testamentary intention of the testator. Thus, if the Court finds real doubts raised of incapacity or suspicious circumstances, the Court may refused to “cure” the document until such issues are resolved at trial.

Contacting a Lawyer on this Subject

James Steele’s preferred practise area is estate litigation, including will challenges, issues surrounding executors, joint account disputes, etc. For more information on this subject, contact James Steele at 1 306 933 1338.

The above is for general information only, and is not legal advice. Parties should always seek legal advice prior to taking action in specific situations.

 

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2021 Law Society of Saskatchewan