Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find Legal AssistanceMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • About Us
      • slider_1Latest News
      • PPSA 1101 (Survey Course) – Free Enrolment for Articling Students in Saskatchewan
      • Family Law Help Sessions – Moose Jaw
      • Articulating a Framework for Cultural Competency in Law: Links between Education and Practice
      • News
        • Legal Sourcery
        • Podcast
        • Re:Source Mail
        • Videos
        • Benchers’ Digest
        • Case Mail
      • Mission and Values
      • Committees and Task Forces
      • Convocation
      • Benchers
        • Bencher Election 2018
        • Bencher Election 2021
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services Initiative
        • Limited Scope Legal Services
      • Equity
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law and Unauthorized Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
        • Designated Representative (DR) Hub
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules, Amendments and Practice Directives
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Pending Admissions and Education Matters
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
        • Disqualification and Reinstatement
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding Legal Assistance
      • Find Legal Assistance Search Guidance
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students-at-law
        • Transfer Lawyers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Consultation
      • Locum Registry
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
      • Health and Wellness
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
      • Presenter Section
  • Shop
Law Society of Saskatchewan Legal Ethics This Week in Legal Ethics – New Professional Conduct Ruling

This Week in Legal Ethics – New Professional Conduct Ruling

March 21, 2018

LegalEthicsBannerBy Melanie Hodges Neufeld

The Law Society’s Ethics Committee recently released the following Professional Conduct Ruling as guidance for the profession. For your convenience, I’ve listed the ruling below but it can also be found in our Professional Conduct Rulings Database.

If you have any questions or concerns  regarding this post, please contact the Law Society at (306) 569-8242 or 1-833-733-0133.

Date:   February 9, 2018
Cite as:   2018 SKLSPC  1
Code Chapter:   4.2; 4.2-1
Code Heading:   Marketing
Classification:   Marketing of Professional Services
Practice Area:   General

Facts:

Law Firm XYZ is looking to increase their online presence, so they contacted a PR company. They would like to hold a contest to encourage current and former clients to write a review on Facebook or Google. Out of an abundance of caution, they wanted to be sure that there were not any ethical or other concerns that they were had not considered.

They propose sending the following to past/present clients:

Law Firm XYZ wishes to offer its former and current clients an opportunity to win exciting prizes while providing valuable feedback on their experience with our office at the same time. Until [date], we are offering our clients to rate our services and write a review on Facebook or Google and be entered to win one of the following exciting prizes:

Grand Prize:                 $500 travel voucher;
Runner-up Prizes:       5 – $100 prepaid credit cards;
Consolation Prizes:     1 of 10 $50 gift cards to Restaurant; 1 of 25 $25 gift cards to Clothing Boutique; 1 of 25 $10 gift cards to Coffee Shop

To enter, simply rate our services and leave a review. Although entrants are limited to one prize, multiple entries are permitted by leaving both a Facebook and Google review. The review can be anonymous to the public under a pseudonym but to qualify for entry, you must provide our office with the username the entry was made under.

To assist participants, information on leaving a Google review can be found here: [link]

Information on leaving a Facebook review can be found here: [link]

Please be honest and forthright in your review(s). We take considerable pride in our work and any feedback you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Decision:

The Ethics Committee discussed the issue and was unable to find anything in the Code that specifically prohibits such a proposal. However, while it is not inherently wrong, there is a significant risk that the results may be unprofessional:

  1. The law firm has no control over what is said about the law firm or the individual lawyer.
  2. A review could breach the privacy or impugn the reputation of a third party.
  3. There is potential for a review to contravene the rules against certain types of marketing as outlined in Commentary [1], Rule 4.2-1:

[1] Examples of marketing that may contravene this rule include:

(a) stating an amount of money that the lawyer has recovered for a client or referring to the lawyer’s degree of success in past cases, unless such statement is accompanied by a further statement that past results are not necessarily indicative of future results and that the amount recovered and other litigation outcomes will vary according to the facts in individual cases;

(b) suggesting qualitative superiority to other lawyers;

(c) raising expectations unjustifiably;

(d) suggesting or implying the lawyer is aggressive;

(e) disparaging or demeaning other persons, groups, organizations or institutions;

(f) taking advantage of a vulnerable person or group; and

(g) using testimonials or endorsements that contain emotional appeals.

  1. Clients may believe the firm will select winners on some basis other than a random draw, and reviews could be more positive than if they were truly anonymous or independent.

It is the Committee’s understanding that a business on Facebook or Google cannot alter or delete reviews about them. While consumer’s reviews would not be governed by the Code, as we do not govern the opinions of the public, in this case the law firm is encouraging and eliciting reviews and providing potential compensation. In offering prizes, this becomes a form of marketing.

Lawyer X suggested that the firm could be clear and outline the types of things that cannot or should not be included. It was also suggested that the firm may advise that they may contact any reviewer and ask them to change or remove their review, if it contains something that contravenes the Code.

Any attempt to meddle with the comments would mean they do not accurately reflect the views of the public and would be advertising disguised as a candid review, and without editing problematic reviews, there is a potential for marketing that is offside the Code. Therefore, the Ethics Committee does not endorse this type of promotional activity.

 

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments are closed.

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Submit News Post

Submission Guidelines

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2022 Law Society of Saskatchewan. Website & Hosting by OmniOnline