Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find Legal AssistanceMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • About Us
      • slider_1Latest News
      • PPSA 1101 (Survey Course) – Free Enrolment for Articling Students in Saskatchewan
      • Family Law Help Sessions – Moose Jaw
      • Articulating a Framework for Cultural Competency in Law: Links between Education and Practice
      • News
        • Legal Sourcery
        • Podcast
        • Re:Source Mail
        • Videos
        • Benchers’ Digest
        • Case Mail
      • Mission and Values
      • Committees and Task Forces
      • Convocation
      • Benchers
        • Bencher Election 2018
        • Bencher Election 2021
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services Initiative
        • Limited Scope Legal Services
      • Equity
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law and Unauthorized Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
        • Designated Representative (DR) Hub
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules, Amendments and Practice Directives
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Pending Admissions and Education Matters
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
        • Disqualification and Reinstatement
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding Legal Assistance
      • Find Legal Assistance Search Guidance
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students-at-law
        • Transfer Lawyers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Consultation
      • Locum Registry
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
      • Health and Wellness
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
      • Presenter Section
  • Shop
Law Society of Saskatchewan Legal Ethics This Week in Legal Ethics – New Professional Conduct Ruling

This Week in Legal Ethics – New Professional Conduct Ruling

August 3, 2016

LegalEthicsBannerBy Melanie Hodges Neufeld

The Law Society’s Ethics Committee recently released the following Professional Conduct Ruling as guidance for the profession. For your convenience, I’ve listed the ruling below but it can also be found in our Professional Conduct Rulings Database.

Date:  June 16, 2016
Cite as:  2016 SKLSPC 4
Code Chapter:  2.04
Code Heading:  Conflicts
Classification:  Duty to Avoid Conflicts of Interest – Rule 2.04(1)
Practice Area:  Wills and Estates; Estate Planning

Facts:

From the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s, Client A, the father, farmed land owned by Lawyer X, a partner of Law Firm XYZ. Lawyer X also provided legal advice to Client A and his wife, Client B.  Lawyer X completed Wills and Powers of Attorney for both parties, in late 1995. The complainant and Client C are siblings and named the joint executors of Client A’s will. Client C is the Power of Attorney for Client B.

In April, 2013, Client A was diagnosed with dementia. In December, 2013, Client C took Client A to see Lawyer X and had property taken out of Client A’s will and transferred to Client C and the Complainant. The Complainant understood that these transfer were done for the purpose of avoiding probate fees and not that they were being removed from Client A’s will. On February 5, 2014, Lawyer X reports to Client C that the land transfers have occurred and that the matter is now complete.

In June, 2014, Client A passes away. Client C and the Complainant are appointed joint executors of his estate, but have a dispute regarding the estate administration.

In April, 2015, Lawyer X retires and Lawyer Z assumes carriage of these files.  Shortly after, the Complainant retains Lawyer J, who writes Client C outlining certain concerns with his actions and requesting certain documents. Lawyer Z responds to Lawyer J advising that his office acts for Client C and that they were assembling the documents required to respond and that would likely need more time to provide the documents.

On May 8, 2015, Lawyer J requests an update on the status and inquires whether there is a conflict of interest in acting for Client C, as Law Firm XYZ had previously acted for Client A.

On May 22, 2015, Lawyer J seeks a further update and indicates that if they do not reply by May 29, 2015, they would be contacting the Public Trustee to advise of Client C’s non-compliance, and would consider an application to the Court of Queen’s Bench to compel disclosure, and to remove him as executor for Client A and POA for Client B.

On June 19, 2015, having received no response, Lawyer J writes the Public Trustee to express their concern that Client C is acting in a manner inconsistent with his fiduciary obligations to their mother in his capacity as Power of Attorney by failing to provide any information or an accounting to the Complainant; that Lawyer Z had failed to address his concern that his office was in a conflict of interest; and seeking the assistance of the Public Guardian Trustee of Saskatchewan in this regard.

On June 23, 2015, Lawyer Z provides various documents reporting to be a personal property attorney account for Client B.  On June 26, 2015, Lawyer Z clarifies his position on the issues raised in the letter to the Public Trustee and indicates that, in his opinion, there is no conflict of interest.

On September 14, 2015, Lawyer J raises concerns with Lawyer Z about the material provided and requesting further information. On October 16, 2015, Lawyer J writes Lawyer Z following up on the status of the matter.

On October 30, 2015, Lawyer Z responds and provides further information. Lawyer Z indicates that Client C has not satisfies the requirements of s.15 of The Powers of Attorney Act.

At no point has Lawyer Z or Law Firm XYZ acted for Client C in his capacity as personal representative of Client A’s estates, nor have they acted for the Complainant. There have been no applications to the court relating to a potential conflict of interest.

Decision:

The Ethics Committee considered whether Lawyer Z is in a conflict of interest. The Committee determined that, based on the material provided, they were unable to find any conflict of interest at this point. There is no conflict, simply by virtue that Lawyer X acted for the father previously and now Lawyer Z acts for the son.

There may be a potential for conflict in the future should a member of Law Firm XYZ need to be called as a witness as part of this dispute; however, it is premature to determine the possibility of a future conflict at this time.

 

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Submit News Post

Submission Guidelines

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2022 Law Society of Saskatchewan. Website & Hosting by OmniOnline