Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find Legal AssistanceMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • About Us
      • slider_1Latest News
      • PPSA 1101 (Survey Course) – Free Enrolment for Articling Students in Saskatchewan
      • Family Law Help Sessions – Moose Jaw
      • Articulating a Framework for Cultural Competency in Law: Links between Education and Practice
      • News
        • Legal Sourcery
        • Podcast
        • Re:Source Mail
        • Videos
        • Benchers’ Digest
        • Case Mail
      • Mission and Values
      • Committees and Task Forces
      • Convocation
      • Benchers
        • Bencher Election 2018
        • Bencher Election 2021
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services Initiative
        • Limited Scope Legal Services
      • Equity
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law and Unauthorized Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
        • Designated Representative (DR) Hub
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules, Amendments and Practice Directives
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Pending Admissions and Education Matters
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
        • Disqualification and Reinstatement
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding Legal Assistance
      • Find Legal Assistance Search Guidance
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students-at-law
        • Transfer Lawyers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Consultation
      • Locum Registry
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
      • Health and Wellness
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
      • Presenter Section
  • Shop
Law Society of Saskatchewan Statutes, Bills, Regulations Update on Recent Policy Work

Update on Recent Policy Work

December 11, 2018

By Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay; reposted with permission from the CanLII blog 

As you may have noticed, CanLII has been quite active this year announcing new content and other improvements, but we would also like to let you know about the policy work we have been involved in this fall.

Copyright Review

First, we submitted a brief to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology’s copyright review discussing Crown copyright and its effect on free access to law in September. We argued that:

  • The law with respect to Crown copyright lacks predictability and transparency;
  • Crown Copyright is a barrier to innovation, especially in the legal sphere; and that
  • Traditional justifications for Crown copyright are no longer valid.

In particular, and in line with CanLII’s historical role of promoting increased access to publicly funded legal information, we explained that:

CanLII has direct knowledge that several Canadian startups interested in developing [innovative] solutions were discouraged due to the lack of access to data and have abandoned the legal sphere altogether. Crown copyright is a barrier to widespread access to this important data and has therefore impeded innovation in the legal field. It is important to overcome this obstacle to allow for more innovation at a time when delays and costs are impeding access to justice, and where it is generally accepted that “as much as 70%-90% of legal needs in society go unmet”.

The work of the committee is still under way, and the best way to be informed about its work is to visit this page.

Keatley v. Teranet Intervention

In October, we jointly filed a motion for leave to intervene before the Supreme Court in the Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc. matter (docket number 37863) with the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, where, once again, Crown copyright is at issue.

Our motion materials state that:

“CanLII is particularly uniquely positioned to make submissions on the benefits open access to legal information provides to Canadians of limited means, as well as researchers and new businesses who have limited financial resources, and conversely how broad interpretation of section 12 [of the Copyright Act] may inhibit access to justice, advancements in legal research and thinking, and innovation.”

On November 15, we received news that our motion for leave to intervene was granted. The hearing is set for January 15.

Norton Rose Fulbright is representing CanLII and the Federation on a pro bono basis in the matter of our joint intervention and we are grateful for their help.

Also instrumental in (informally) helping us monitor and understand what’s happening in this surprisingly active field were Kim Nayyer and Ken Fox, Co-Chairs of the CALL/ACBD Copyright Committee. As you may have noticed if you subscribe to CALL/ACBD’s newsletter, they have also announced earlier this week that their organization’s intervention in Keatley has been accepted.

We have uploaded our motion materials and our brief for those who are interested in reading more about the points raised by CanLII as part of its policy efforts. We will of course post our factum in Keatley, when submitted.

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Submit News Post

Submission Guidelines

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2022 Law Society of Saskatchewan. Website & Hosting by OmniOnline