Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find Legal AssistanceMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • About Us
      • slider_1Latest News
      • Pride Month 2022
      • Court of Queen’s Bench Administrative Notice
      • New Judicial Appointments in the Province of Saskatchewan
      • News
        • Legal Sourcery
        • Podcast
        • ReSource
        • Videos
        • Benchers’ Digest
        • Case Mail
      • Mission and Values
      • Committees and Task Forces
      • Convocation
      • Benchers
        • Bencher Election 2018
        • Bencher Election 2021
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services Initiative
        • Limited Scope Legal Services – Information for the Public
        • Limited Scope Legal Services – Information for Lawyers
      • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
        • Equity Office
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law and Unauthorized Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
        • Designated Representative (DR) Hub
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules, Amendments and Practice Directives
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Pending Admissions and Education Matters
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
        • Disqualification and Reinstatement
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding Legal Assistance
      • Find Legal Assistance Search Guidance
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students-at-law
        • Transfer Lawyers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Consultation
      • Locum Registry
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
      • Health and Wellness
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • CPD Activity Application Form
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
      • Presenter Section
  • Shop
Law Society of Saskatchewan Legal History God’s Teeth: The Magna Carta in 1215 (Throwback Thursday)

God’s Teeth: The Magna Carta in 1215 (Throwback Thursday)

September 10, 2015

magnacarta1By Ken Fox

(Part 1 of a series)

“John … when he heard of the latter chapter, the forty-ninth … is described as having wrought himself into a furious passion and swearing by ‘God’s teeth’ his favourite oath, that we would never agree to such demands on the part of any of them, that he would never enslave himself to any of his barons upon any consideration.”

In 1066 England was won at the point of a sword, that of William the Conqueror of Normandy, who led his army of knights by example and slew many enemy warriors with his own blade. His domestic rule was equally brutal, favouring the cutting off of both hands, or a limb, or both eyes, as punishments for routine offences.

William’s successors, wielding power inherited rather than acquired by force, were also brutal, but ruled more through administrative means. It was a time of population growth and economic expansion, and the feudal bureaucracy grew to take full advantage of the country’s wealth, while the state of law lagged behind. The development of laws and charters, rather than representing the Crown’s authority over the people, would be an expression of the growing liberty of the nobility from the arbitrary power of kings.

It was all about land. There was no big money capital or banks. Land was power, and to a ruler, land was income. The kings granted parcels of lands to their barons in exchange for loyalty, taxes and military service. Strong kings conquered new lands, or at least held onto their inherited ones. Weak kings lost territory to rivals and made up for lost revenue by collecting more from their subjects in the forms of myriad fees and taxes, thereby risking revolt.

John was a weak king. In 1205, the fifth year of his reign, he lost Normandy and the entire continental portion of the Angevin empire, to the French. The rest of his life would be a doomed attempt to recover his lands and his dignity.

How does a medieval king build an army to conquer a foreign territory? Can he simply enlist the able-bodied men of this realm to fight for him? In the early thirteenth century, the king’s ability to summon a domestic military was surprisingly limited. The nobility, whose traditional role was defending their country, could choose to pay taxes in lieu of military service, in an arrangement called scuttage. In a time of prosperity it is little wonder that they took advantage of this option to serve the foreign military conquests of their disgraced king.

So King John’s army was to consist, in large part, of hired mercenaries. As in every other aspect of his war fundraising, he exploited scuttage well beyond the bounds of custom. As Kim and Melanie tell us, the Magna Carta is remembered today for its early invocation of modern ideas such as due process, women’s rights, and access to justice. But at the time a more pressing issue was the limitations it placed on collection of scuttage and other fees.

By 1213, the English barons were in open revolt, and began to support French King Philip to take the English throne by force. At this point, John was at war with France, Scotland, Wales, his own barons, and the Pope, who had excommunicated him in 1209 over a disagreement as to the choice of Archbishop of England.

John needed an ally, and it was this last enemy, the Catholic Church, who he turned to. In May of 1213, he resigned his throne to the Pope, who restored religious services to England, ordered King Philip to desist from invading England, and asked the English barons to cease their revolt. John would remain “King” of England, but with a new landlord overseeing his rule.

King Philip, in deference to the pope, cancelled his invasion plans, but the barons continued to press, not respecting the combined authority of the Pope and King John, who practiced all manners of treachery in evading their demands for liberties. On Easter 1215 they staged an armed insurrection, presenting their demands in the form of 49 articles, which would form the basis of the Magna Carta, including an enforcement scheme (“teeth”) that endowed broad policing powers to 25 appointed barons. It is at this point that John made his remark, quoted above, about “God’s teeth” – but he reluctantly assented to the articles. The charter was won by sword, and peace was restored.

But not for long. The king, never intending to surrender so much to his subjects permanently, wrote to the Pope, requesting a repeal of the charter, which the Pope granted by way of Papal Bull dated August 24, 1215. The teeth of God sided with the king.

But as Kim notes, the repeal of the charter did not pacify the barons, who escalated the civil war. John continued to battle his barons until October 1216, when he died suddenly of dysentery.

This would have been a good time for the English barons to align with Louis, the new King of France, who had an eye on the English throne, in exchange for some granting of liberties. But instead, they consented to the crowning of John’s nine-year-old son, Henry III, coupled with the rule of William Marshall, Earl of Pembroke, who had been loyal to John throughout the dispute. So here the Magna Carta dies – or does it?

Works Consulted:

Barrington, Boyd C. The Magna Charta and other Great Charters of England. (Littleton, CO: Rothman & Co., 1993)

Bates, David. William the Conqueror. (Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2004)

Breay, Claire. Magna Carta: Manuscripts and Myths. (London: The British Library, 2002)

Holt, J.C. Magna Carta. 2d ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)

Howard, A.E. Dick. The Magna Carta: Text and Commentary. Carlottesville: (University Press of Virginia, 1964)

Swindler, William F. Magna Carta: Legend and Legacy. (Indianapolis: Bobs-Merril Co., 1965)

 

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Submit News Post

Submission Guidelines

Archives

Categories

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2022 Law Society of Saskatchewan. Website & Hosting by OmniOnline