Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find a LawyerMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • COVID 19 Updates
    • Covid 19Covid 19 Updates
      • Client Resources
        • Client Interaction Considerations
        • Client Identification and Verification
        • Testamentary Documents
      • Practice Interruptions
      • COVID-19 Response FAQs
      • COVID-19 HR Related FAQs
      • Health and Wellness
        • Wellness Together Canada
      • Technology Webinars
        • Working Remotely Resources
      • Business and Economic Support
  • About Us
    • About LSS VideoAbout Us
      Play video Our independence from the government is primary to our mission; it is important to the administration of justice and is fundamental to maintaining a free and democratic society that respects the Rule of Law. That is, the legal profession is uniquely positioned in society to provide a check and balance on government power by ensuring citizens who are in conflict with the government have access to impartial legal representation and ensuring accountability in all areas of society.
      • Mission, Vision, Values and Direction
      • Executive
      • Benchers
        • 2018 Bencher Election
      • Convocation
      • 2021 Committees and Task Forces
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Contact Us
  • News
      • slider_1Latest News
      • Practitioner Staff Appeals Tribunal Position
      • Call for Applicants for Adjudicators
      • Saskatchewan Estate Litigation Update: Adams Estate v Wilson: Who has standing to challenge a Will?
      • Podcasts
      • Legal Sourcery
      • Annual Reports
      • Benchers’ Digest
      • Re:Source Mail
      • Video
      • Case Mail
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services
        • Saskatchewan Legal Coaching and Unbundled Services Pilot Project
      • Equity
      • Legal Information
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
        • National Trusted Intermediaries and Legal Information Network
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules and Amendments
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Admissions and Education Proceedings
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Firm Regulation
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding a Lawyer
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Designated Holidays
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students
        • National Mobility Transfers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Membership Services
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Lost Will Listings
      • Locum Registry
        • Information for Lawyers Seeking Locum Work
        • Tips for Hiring a Locum Lawyer
        • The Contract: Potential Issues and Sample Clauses
        • Ethical Issues and Practice Management
        • Professional Liability Insurance
        • Technology Preparedness
        • Locum Lawyer Scenarios
        • Locum Lawyer Registry
        • Disclaimer
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Resources from the Courts
        • Internet and Technology
        • Tables and Indices
        • Forms and Guidelines
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
  • Shop
Search

Load More

Generic filters
Law Society of Saskatchewan Uncategorized Saskatchewan Estate Litigation Update: Adams Estate v Wilson: Who has standing to challenge a Will?

Saskatchewan Estate Litigation Update: Adams Estate v Wilson: Who has standing to challenge a Will?

January 11, 2021

By James D Steele 

A recent case from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal reminds us of the importance of first confirming you have standing to challenge a will.

“Standing” refers to the question of whether a person has a sufficient legal interest in a given dispute. In other words, will they be in a different position, depending on the outcome of the proceeding? If they do not have such interest, they cannot be a party in that  proceeding.

In Adams Estate v Wilson, 2020 SKCA 38, an elderly woman died with no children. She left a large ranching operation, and land holdings. A neighbor, Mr. Wilson, claimed that he had helped the deceased for decades, and in return, she allegedly had promised him two things:

  1. That she would pay him $1,000 per month to help cover expenses such as gas and use of his truck and tools; and
  2. That Mr. Wilson would inherit her ranching operation and all her land, cattle and equipment when she died.

This agreement was  not in writing, and Mr. Wilson was further not named in the deceased’s will.

The deceased made the will in May of 2011. It made no direct mention of Mr. Wilson. The will was vague, and not specific. It  said that her  executor, a Mr. Staples, knew that certain persons were trustworthy and loyal and helpful to the deceased, and Mr. Staples was  to use his best judgment to ensure that some portion of the estate is given to those persons.

Mr. Wilson was also not a family member  of the deceased. Thus, he would not benefit in the case of an intestacy (i.e. a situation in which no will was found valid). Moreover, Mr. Wilson was not a beneficiary of any prior will made by the deceased.

The issue:

Despite the above, Mr. Wilson brought an application to prove the will in solemn form. Solemn form means that  a will must go  through a much more rigorous trial process to see if it is truly a valid will. Typically, a solemn form application is brought if someone thinks a given will is invalid.

Here, the issue  on appeal was whether Mr. Wilson had standing to apply for solemn form.

The Court of Appeal held  that he did not. In reality, Mr. Wilson’s claim was a debt claim, not a claim involving the validity of the will. Even if he did prove himself a creditor, the Court noted that creditors have no right to challenge the validity of a will. More practically, even if Mr. Wilson struck down the will as invalid, that outcome alone would place him no closer to obtaining monies out of the estate:

[79]           I have concluded, based on my previous analysis, that as a creditor or potential creditor of the estate, Mr. Wilson does not have the kind of interest that would entitle him to challenge the Will or require it be proven in solemn form. As well, Mr. Wilson does not have standing as a potential creditor in that, if his application to set aside the Will was successful and an intestacy were created, there would be nothing to be gained by him as a creditor. His claim against the estate would be the same. He has no stake in the outcome and, therefore, standing under Rule 16-46 cannot be established. [emphasis added]

Alternatively, Mr. Wilson also claimed that he had standing, in that  he might eventually be proven (at a future trial) to be one of the persons who were  considered “trustworthy and loyal and helpful”. However, this argument too did not explain why  Mr. Wilson was therefore applying to strike down the will. If Mr. Wilson succeeded in such an application, he would invalidate the “very bequest upon which he based his claim of standing,” and have “eliminated any chance that he would take under the Will” (para 84).

Mr. Wilson later sought to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, but leave to appeal was not given.

Conclusion:

In short, anyone  who wishes  to challenge a will should ask if their legal, and practical, position will be improved by striking down a given will. In the case of someone like Mr. Wilson, it appears that another strategic path open to him would simply have been to:

  1. Avoid the expense of a will challenge;
  2. Instead, advance his claim as creditor to a determination, while considering interim measures to pause distribution of the estate assets.
Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 Responses to “Saskatchewan Estate Litigation Update: Adams Estate v Wilson: Who has standing to challenge a Will?”

  1. Bridge Dale says:
    January 19, 2021 at 4:06 am

    I wanted to ask if the recent case from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal reminds us of anything about inheritance or not? Can anyone explain this to me? I really need this information.

    Reply
    • Julie Sobowale says:
      January 19, 2021 at 6:03 pm

      Hi Bridge, we’ve sent a note to the author who will respond to your request.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2021 Law Society of Saskatchewan