Law Society of Saskatchewan
Find Legal AssistanceMember ProfileMember ResourcesContact
  • 0
    Cart
  • My Account
  • About Us
      • slider_1Latest News
      • Pride Month 2022
      • Court of Queen’s Bench Administrative Notice
      • New Judicial Appointments in the Province of Saskatchewan
      • News
        • Legal Sourcery
        • Podcast
        • ReSource
        • Videos
        • Benchers’ Digest
        • Case Mail
      • Mission and Values
      • Committees and Task Forces
      • Convocation
      • Benchers
        • Bencher Election 2018
        • Bencher Election 2021
      • Annual and Financial Reports
      • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • slider_1Initiatives
      The Law Society is seeking to identify legal service providers for new initiatives. This unique approach, the first of its kind in Canada, enables the Law Society to expand access to appropriately regulated legal services in a responsible and sustainable manner. The overall goal is to balance the need for enhanced access to legal services for underserved Saskatchewan citizens while ensuring public protection. For more information, click below. Consultation
      • Access to Justice
        • Future of Legal Services Initiative
        • Limited Scope Legal Services – Information for the Public
        • Limited Scope Legal Services – Information for Lawyers
      • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
        • Equity Office
      • Legal Information
        • Legal Information Guidelines
        • Saskatchewan Access to Legal Information
      • Innovating Regulation
      • Truth and Reconciliation
        • Additional Resources
        • Notice to Day School Survivors
      • Saskatchewan Justicia Project
  • Regulation
    • slider_1Remote Executing Of Certain Documents And Remote Witnessing Of Wills By Electronic Means Legislation Now Permanent
      We are happy to announce that today, the Government of Saskatchewan repealed the temporary emergency regulations related to remote execution of certain documents and wills and replaced those regulations with permanent regulations allowing for remote execution of documents via electronic means (i.e. video calls) to continue long-term beyond the end of the public emergency period. Practice Directives
      • Definition of the Practice of Law and Unauthorized Practice of Law
      • Firm Regulation
        • Designated Representative (DR) Hub
      • Act, Code and Rules
        • The Legal Profession Act, 1990
        • Code of Professional Conduct and Amendments
        • Law Society Rules, Amendments and Practice Directives
        • Rules Concordance – Read More
      • Hearings, Decisions and Rulings
        • Pending Discipline Matters
        • Discipline Decisions
        • Conduct Review Database
        • Ethics Rulings Database
        • Pending Admissions and Education Matters
        • Admissions and Education Decisions
        • Disqualification and Reinstatement
      • Lawyers with Practice Conditions/Restrictions
      • Lawyer Trusteeships and Successors
      • Potential Complaint Outcomes
        • Ethics Committee
        • Competency Committee
        • Conduct Investigation Committee
  • Public
    • slider_1New Law Society Complaint Form
      The goal is to assist and encourage complainants to provide clear and concise descriptions of their concerns, and reduce confusion by removing technical terms that may not be fully understood by members of the general public (i.e.: “conflict of interest”). Complaint Form
      • Finding Legal Assistance
      • Find Legal Assistance Search Guidance
      • What to Expect From Your Lawyer
      • Looking For Lost Wills
      • Making a Complaint
        • Complaints Process
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Understanding Lawyers’ Fees
        • Quality of Service
        • Conflict of Interest
        • Confidentiality
        • Withdrawal
        • File Transfers
      • Common Client Concerns
        • Role of an Estate’s Lawyer
        • Role of Opposing Lawyer
        • Breach of Trust Conditions/Undertakings
        • Lawyer’s Conduct in Court
        • Lawyer’s Outside Interests
  • Lawyers and Students
    • hiring sign resizedCareer and Volunteer Opportunities
      • Becoming a Lawyer in Saskatchewan
        • Students-at-law
        • Transfer Lawyers
        • International Applicants
      • Becoming a Principal
      • Career And Volunteer Opportunities
        • Students Seeking Articles
      • Membership Services
      • Awards, Bursaries, Scholarships
      • Consultation
      • Locum Registry
      • Practice Advisor Program
      • Forms and Fees
        • Law Society Forms
        • Trust Account Forms
      • Western Conveyancing Protocol
        • Protocol for Saskatchewan
      • Practice Resources
        • General Resources
        • Queen’s Bench Rules
      • Health and Wellness
  • Legal Resources
  • CPD
    • slider_1Continuing Professional Development
      • CPD Activities
        • CPD Calendar of Activities
        • CPD On Demand (Subscription)
        • CPD Activity Application Form
        • Recorded Versions Shop
        • Study Group Resources
      • CPD Policy
        • Reporting CPD Hours
        • Eligible CPD Activities
        • Approved Providers
        • Remedial CPD Plan Information
        • FAQs
        • Transition to One-Year CPD Term
      • Contact Us
      • Volunteers
      • Presenter Section
  • Shop
Law Society of Saskatchewan Legal Research Speech Balloons & Blue Jalapeños

Speech Balloons & Blue Jalapeños

February 7, 2020

By Ken Fox, Reference Librarian

If you have used CanLII recently, you may have noticed a couple of new visual elements.

First, pull up a case – Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 87, http://canlii.ca/t/g2s18, for example. Notice the series of tabs across the top of the header, immediately below the case citation in large type. The fourth tab from the left is “Cited by (3,580).” The number in parentheses is the number of other cases that have cited the present case. This is not new.

Now note that immediately to the right of the number of citing cases there is what appears to be a blue jalapeño pepper –

This is new. Only cases that have been discussed with a certain level of “intensity” have the blue pepper icon. Click on the link, and as always, you receive a list of citing cases. But a couple of things are different.

First, according to CanLII’s blog post, they have beefed up their sorting algorithm to ensure that the cases that contain the “most extensive discussion” float to the top of their relevance ranking, and they improved their snippets for better browsing of the results.

Second, the blue jalapeño peppers now serve as a rating system – 5 jalapeño peppers indicate the most extensive treatment, whereas zero peppers mean the case is merely mentioned.

The jalapeño pepper system is new to CanLII but is not really novel (except for the idea of equating extensiveness/intensiveness with spiciness, which I approve of). Advance QuickLaw’s citation system has “types” of treatment that include implied intensity levels (“followed,” “explained,” “mentioned”). WestlawNext Canada has both treatment type and “depth” of treatment in their KeyCite reports. So let’s congratulate CanLII for once again giving to the general public what previously was only available to clients of the large publishing companies.

However, the OTHER new feature discussed in CanLII’s blog post, is to my knowledge something new in Canada.

Look at that Hryniak decision again (or any recent higher court judgment). Scroll down to the written reasons and look at the right-hand margin. Many paragraphs have at the right edge a grey bar, and beside the grey bar there is a speech bubble with a number –

The darkness of the bar indicates how often that paragraph has been cited in other cases, and the number is how many cases cite it.

Now click on the bubble –

You have three options in a pop-up menu. The first, “Copy text,” makes it very easy to place that paragraph on your clipboard to paste it into your document. The second option gives you an instant pinpoint citation –

Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 87, par. 2, <http://canlii.ca/t/g2s18#par2>, retrieved on 2020-02-06

And the third option (you may have guessed) gives you a citation list for the paragraph. To make it abundantly clear – only cases that quote words from that exact paragraph are included.

At a glance, you can now see what the most authoritative (frequently cited) paragraphs are. But you now have the power to get a list of citing cases for a particular legal point and exclude all those cases that cite the authority on a separate issue. This is indeed a powerful new tool for legal researchers.

To keep up with the latest innovations in legal research technology, be sure to bookmark CanLII’s blog (alongside LegalSourcery, which of course you have already bookmarked).

Share this:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 Responses to “Speech Balloons & Blue Jalapeños”

  1. Ron Parchomchuk says:
    February 10, 2020 at 8:55 am

    Great comments on this feature. Thanks.

    Reply
    • Ken says:
      February 10, 2020 at 4:50 pm

      Thanks for reading and commenting Ron!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Submit News Post

Submission Guidelines

Archives

Categories

Online Tools

  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • LSS Initiatives
  • For Lawyers & Students
  • For the Public
  • Regulation
  • CPD

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for the latest news from our blog "Legal Sourcery".

Stay Connected

Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin

© 2022 Law Society of Saskatchewan. Website & Hosting by OmniOnline